
Automotive
Brand Valuation for an Automotive Technology Supplier

Business Challenge
One of the largest automotive technology companies in the world has rebranded its company, which involved the abandonment of an old traditional name in favor of a new brand name. After the rebrand, the client has commissioned a brand valuation study (B2B) to determine the strength of the new brand in its target audience: decision-makers and influencers in Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and High-Performance OEMs.
The research was designed by Jasper Colin to compare the new brand with the major rivals on the levels of awareness, consideration, purchase, loyalty, and brand perception.
320+ | 6 | 30+ |
|---|
Client Background
The Client is a well-established automotive technology firm that provides advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and other related parts to international OEM clients. The company has gone through a major rebranding process whereby it has changed its brand name but retained decades of industry experience and a worldwide consumer base.
After the rebrand, the company needed to know:
Methodology
Survey Design
The questionnaire was divided into three parts: screener, brand funnel, and BEVA (Brand Equity Valuation Assessment)
Target Group & Screener Criteria
The respondents had to qualify as per the strict qualification criteria to be relevant:
The departments covered were R&D/Engineering, Procurement, Quality Management, Production, Sales and Marketing, and Logistics. The respondents were between mid-level professionals and C-suite executives.
Competitor Set
The client has been compared with 7 competitor brands on all the essential metrics. Logos were provided to all the brands to facilitate proper identification.
BEVA — Brand Equity Assessment
The BEVA model measured the client brand on five hierarchical status levels of function, market, psychographic, identity, and myth on a standardized 1-5 Likert scale. The following table provides a summary of the scores of all 30+ items measured.
| BEVA Dimension | Criterion | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Function Status | Perceived Quality | Product quality and value-added features |
| Function Status | Brand Protection | Distinctiveness of logo, name, and identity |
| Market Status | Awareness Level | Brand recognition and media presence |
| Market Status | Degree of Distribution | Product portfolio completeness |
| Psychographic Status | Brand Reputation | Overall industry standing |
| Psychographic Status | Brand Personality | Reliability, competence, modernity |
| Identity Status | Brand Trust | Expertise, reliability, understanding |
| Identity Status | Brand Loyalty | Affinity and repeat intention |
| Myth Status | Individual Brand Values | Delivery of quality and excellence |
| Myth Status | Timelessness | Authenticity and future orientation |
Key Takeaways & Recommendations
According to the survey results, the following strategic recommendations were found:
Outlook
This BEVA study gave the Client a data-driven, structured baseline of brand equity in its B2B target market right after a significant rebranding. Although there is an inherent difficulty with re-establishing brand recognition following a name change, the Client had significant strengths in reputation, product quality, and customer loyalty among people who are already aware of the brand.
The research has revealed definite, practical gaps, especially in the area of market awareness, innovation perception, and tagline recognition, which, when managed strategically, provide a considerable opportunity to increase brand equity and competitive positioning in the global market of OEM suppliers.