Jasper Colin
Brand Valuation for an Automotive Technology Supplier
Automotive10th April, 2026

Brand Valuation for an Automotive Technology Supplier

Business Challenge

 

One of the largest automotive technology companies in the world has rebranded its company, which involved the abandonment of an old traditional name in favor of a new brand name. After the rebrand, the client has commissioned a brand valuation study (B2B) to determine the strength of the new brand in its target audience: decision-makers and influencers in Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and High-Performance OEMs.

The research was designed by Jasper Colin to compare the new brand with the major rivals on the levels of awareness, consideration, purchase, loyalty, and brand perception.

320+
Survey Respondents

6
Countries Covered

 30+
Brand Metrics Tracked

Client Background

The Client is a well-established automotive technology firm that provides advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and other related parts to international OEM clients. The company has gone through a major rebranding process whereby it has changed its brand name but retained decades of industry experience and a worldwide consumer base.

After the rebrand, the company needed to know:

  • The level of recognition of the new brand name in the market.
  • Whether the rebranding had been made known to key decision-makers.
  • The perception of the brand in comparison to the competitors in emotional, functional, and strategic aspects.
  • What were the obstacles to thinking and buying among non-customers?

Methodology

Survey Design

The questionnaire was divided into three parts: screener, brand funnel, and BEVA (Brand Equity Valuation Assessment)

Target Group & Screener Criteria

The respondents had to qualify as per the strict qualification criteria to be relevant:

  • Full-time or part-time (not entry-level / junior) employed.
  • Experience in the automotive industry as either an OEM or high-performance OEM.
  • Having some control over the buying behavior of suppliers.
  • At least a minimum acquaintance with the Client brand (at least known by name).

The departments covered were R&D/Engineering, Procurement, Quality Management, Production, Sales and Marketing, and Logistics. The respondents were between mid-level professionals and C-suite executives.

Competitor Set

The client has been compared with 7 competitor brands on all the essential metrics. Logos were provided to all the brands to facilitate proper identification.

BEVA — Brand Equity Assessment

The BEVA model measured the client brand on five hierarchical status levels of function, market, psychographic, identity, and myth on a standardized 1-5 Likert scale. The following table provides a summary of the scores of all 30+ items measured.

BEVA DimensionCriterionDescription
Function StatusPerceived QualityProduct quality and value-added features
Function StatusBrand ProtectionDistinctiveness of logo, name, and identity
Market StatusAwareness LevelBrand recognition and media presence
Market StatusDegree of DistributionProduct portfolio completeness
Psychographic StatusBrand ReputationOverall industry standing
Psychographic StatusBrand PersonalityReliability, competence, modernity
Identity StatusBrand TrustExpertise, reliability, understanding
Identity StatusBrand LoyaltyAffinity and repeat intention
Myth StatusIndividual Brand ValuesDelivery of quality and excellence
Myth StatusTimelessnessAuthenticity and future orientation

Key Takeaways & Recommendations

According to the survey results, the following strategic recommendations were found:

  1. Accelerate rebranding communication to improve awareness. 
  2. Boost visibility through trade and digital channels. 
  3. Strengthen innovation messaging and differentiation. 
  4. Deepen loyalty with proactive customer support. 
  5. Refine tagline through focused message testing.

Outlook

This BEVA study gave the Client a data-driven, structured baseline of brand equity in its B2B target market right after a significant rebranding. Although there is an inherent difficulty with re-establishing brand recognition following a name change, the Client had significant strengths in reputation, product quality, and customer loyalty among people who are already aware of the brand.

The research has revealed definite, practical gaps, especially in the area of market awareness, innovation perception, and tagline recognition, which, when managed strategically, provide a considerable opportunity to increase brand equity and competitive positioning in the global market of OEM suppliers.

Featured
Case Studies
Automotive

Brand Valuation for an Automotive Technology Supplier

Multiple

Global ESG Ratings Research - Understanding How Enterprises Evaluate Sustainability Standards

Automotive

Competitive Landscape Analysis of Automotive Aftermarket Spare Parts

Automotive

Evaluating Online Classified Platforms in Automotive Retail

We use cookies to improve your browsing experience and to better understand how visitors use our website. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Brand Valuation for an Automotive Technology Supplier | Jasper Colin